[Update 1/16: Drakes Bay Oyster Company's public relations attorney Peter Prows has announced he plans to appeal the 9th Circuit's denial of an en banc rehearing to the Supreme Court. If that doesn't work he claims to have plans to return to the District Court for further litigation. Mr. Prows and Drake's Bay Oyster may want to consider at what point their legal decisions will be viewed as frivolous. Lawyers advertising in the Yellow Pages for clients may be acceptable to some. Advertising through frivolous litigation is viewed quite differently, both by potential clients and the courts. Especially after having been ruled against so many times.]
"The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted."
"The full court has been advised of the petition
for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote
on whether to rehear the matter en banc."
United States Court of Appeals
For the 9th Circuit, January 14, 2014
Completion of the only marine wilderness
area on the west coast outside of Alaska
will at last be allowed to happen.
